ADIR ACEVEDO, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ADIR ACEVEDO, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
820 So. 2d 395
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order denying postconviction relief as to point 2 on authority of Major v. State, 814 So. 2d 424 (Fla.2002). As to point 1, the issue appears both time-barred (as it could have been brought during appellant’s incarceration) and moot. We see no merit in the claim of procedural error. Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jongewaard v. State, 824 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)…ty of Palm Bay v. State Dep’t of Transp., 588 So. 2d 624, 628 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)(holding a duly promulgated administrative rule is “presumptively valid until invalidated in a section 120.56 rule challenge.”). Id. at 1153. See also Mosley v. State, 820 So. 2d 395 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). When Jongewaard was released from prison in 1999, because he did not have the requisite prior felony commitment required by the statute or the Commission’s rule, he was improperly placed on conditional release status. According…
Authorities Cited
- Daron Merritt v. State, 814 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 2002)