RICHARD HARRIS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2002-06-14
Nos. 2D00-3820, 2D00-3821
SALCINES and KELLY, JJ„ concur.
817 So. 2d 1100 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2002) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case


Opinion of the Court
GREEN, Judge.

GREEN, Judge.

We reverse the sentences entered upon the revocation of Richard Harris’s probation in case number 95-00104 and his community control in case number 99-18309. Multiple points on appeal have been raised concerning the appropriateness of the sentences as applied to each of the two eases and whether Harris received the correct credit for time served. No written order revoking probation or community control was entered, and Harris’s motion to correct the illegal sentences was not ruled upon and, therefore, is deemed denied. The State concedes that this cause must be remanded for resentencing and for the entry of an appropriate order. We therefore reverse and remand for the entry of an order revoking probation and community control and for resentencing to reflect credit for time served.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

SALCINES and KELLY, JJ„ concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Pascarelli v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 18 So. 3d 53 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009)
    …by that ruling. Our sister court in the second district has noted in a very similar case that an employee in an unemployment compensation hearing “has a basic right to the compulsory attendance of witnesses.” Ibarra v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 817 So. 2d 1100, 1101 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). Merely because the Appeals Referee believes that the testimony sought to be presented might not be helpful, does not give that official the authority simply to decline to allow the employee to call the witnesses. O’Blenis v…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw