ANTINORI HARRIS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ANTINORI HARRIS, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
816 So. 2d 245
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The conviction and sentence is affirmed in all respects. See Reyes v. State, 700 So. 2d 458 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Miller v. State, 430 So. 2d 611 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). However, since the defendant objected to the restitution amount, the case must be remanded for a restitution hearing. See Strickland v. State, 746 So. 2d 1189 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).
Affirmed and remanded for a restitution hearing.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gardino Martinez Mesa v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2023)
-
Gardino Martinez Mesa v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2023)…is on the state attorney. See § 775.089(7), Fla. Stat. (2019); Strickland v. State, 746 So. 2d 1189, 1190 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (“[S]ection 775.089(7) contemplates an evidentiary hearing where there is a dispute as to restitution.”); Harris v. State, 816 So. 2d 245, 245 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). Accordingly, we reverse the restitution order and remand this case to the trial court to conduct a new restitution hearing.2 Affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in part. 2 As we vacate the restitution order and remand…
Authorities Cited
- Miller v. State, 430 So. 2d 611 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)
- Reyes v. State, 700 So. 2d 458 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
- McLEOD v. State, 700 So. 2d 458 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
- Chamberlain v. State, 746 So. 2d 1189 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)