WILLADEUR ALPHONZO, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Coram Nobis cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant raised numerous grounds of trial court error and ineffective assistance of counsel, as well as claims of involuntariness, in his untimely motion for postconviction relief, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We find that all but one of the claims are clearly timely under Wood v. State, 750 So. 2d 592 (Fla.1999), but they are either insufficient or conclusively refuted by the record. The remaining claim is not traditionally cognizable under coram nobis and is thus untimely. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s denial of relief.
However, we note that Appellant’s motion was styled with five case numbers. The trial court’s order is styled with only one case number, 91-11490-CF. Our af-firmance relates to both the substantive and violation of probation cases styled under case number 91-11490-CF, as the trial court’s order addressed both cases. However, our affirmance is without prejudice to the Appellant challenging any orders entered with respect to the other case numbers.
WARNER, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ortega-Mantilla v. State, 898 So. 2d 1164 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)…e jury that their job is to determine whether the 'defendant meets this status.” Burton v. State, 884 So. 2d 1112, 1114 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (citing Standard Jury Instructions — Criminal Cases (99-2), 777 So. 2d 366, 367 (Fla.2000)); Rodgers v. State, 815 So. 2d 737, 740-41 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). “The only caveat to the use of the term is that it must not become a ‘feature of the trial.’ ” Burton, 884 So. 2d at 1114. As did the court in Burton and Rodgers, we cannot conclude that use of the particular phrase becam…
-
Kleckley v. State, 857 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)…d May 1, 2002, this court affirmed the trial court’s denial of Kleck-ley’s motion for postconviction relief due to his failure to comply with the requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.987 when filing the motion. See Kleekley v. State, 815 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). The affirmance was without prejudice to him re-filing with the trial court, within thirty days after the date of the opinion, his motion for postconviction relief in compliance with the rule. See id. at 737 (citing Lawson v. Sta…
Authorities Cited
- Wood v. State, 750 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 1999)