KIMONIE NORMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
KIMONIE NORMAN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
814 So. 2d 1223
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Toomajan v. State, 785 So. 2d 1275 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).
COBB, PETERSON and PLEUS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
D.O. v. State, 961 So. 2d 1053 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)…nded lenient disposition, it is clear from this record that the trial court would have deviated upward for the four valid reasons, irrespective of the unsupported reason. The inclusion of an unsupported ground is harmless error. See J.L.W. v. State, 814 So. 2d 1223 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (finding harmless error in trial court’s limiting juvenile’s cross-examination of co-respondent who testified for state in delinquency adjudication proceeding). Accordingly, we AFFIRM the disposition order. BARFIELD and ROBERTS,…
-
McPHEARSON v. State, 997 So. 2d 1207 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)…WELLS, J. Affirmed. See J.L.W. v. State, 814 So. 2d 1223, 1224 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (finding that charging the defendant with burglary of a structure, as opposed to burglary of a [*1208] conveyance, was not reversible error because “[t]here was ‘not such variance [between the charge and the proof] here as c…
Authorities Cited
- Toomajan v. State, 785 So. 2d 1275 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)