STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,

v.

JAMES PEACOCK, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• N.L. v. Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., 843 So. 2d 996 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)
  …contrary. No evidence in the record shows long-term abuse or a pattern of abuse of S.W. which might form a basis for a finding that N.L. “knowingly failed to prevent” the abuse of S.W. by the boyfriend. See M.C. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 814 So. 2d 449, 451-52 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Dep’t of Children & Families v. Court of Appeal, Third District, 788 So. 2d 988, 989-90 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); In re B.S., 697 So. 2d 914, 917 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997), rev. denied, 707 So. 2d 1123 (Fla.1998); In re D.E.N., 504 S…
• In the Interest of K.A. v. Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., 880 So. 2d 705 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)
  …nd health of this child. See N.L. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 843 So. 2d 996, 1001 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (holding egregious conduct occurred when infant was shaken forcefully enough to break bones); M.C. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 814 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (holding egregious conduct occurred with one-year-old child who had broken arm, skull fracture, bruising, healing rib fracture, and other indications of neglect). In the context of egregious conduct, this court has held that “whe…
• C.W. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 814 So. 2d 488 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)
  …as occurred here, section 39.806(2) does not require reasonable efforts be undertaken to preserve and reunify families, nor does section 39.806(3) require a case plan for the goal of reunification. See also M.C. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 814 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).3 I am not sure whether the legislature can trump the fundamental, constitutional liberty interest that a parent enjoys in the [*496] care, custody, and management of his or her children by providing that a termination proceedin…

Authorities Cited

• Soca v. State, 673 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 1996)