W. H. TUNNICLIFFE, AS RECEIVER OF COMMERCIAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
THE CITY NATIONAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY, OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, APPELLEE
W. H. TUNNICLIFFE, AS RECEIVER OF COMMERCIAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY, APPELLANT,
THE CITY NATIONAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY, OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, APPELLEE
96 Fla. 544
Florida Supreme Court (1928)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The decree in this case should be affirmed upon authority of the opinion in the case of Atlantic National Bank of Jacksonville v. Pratt, receiver, opinion filed April 26, 1928, reported 116 So. R. 635, and it is so ordered.
Affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J. concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Edwards v. Lewis, 98 Fla. 956 (Fla. 1929)…, forwarding bank is entitled to a preference in payment by the receiver of collecting bank for the collections made. The Atlantic National Bank-Pratt case was followed in Tunnicliffe, as Receiver, v. The City Nat. Bank and Tr. Co., 118 So. R. 319, 96 Fla. 544. Applying the rule stated in the Pratt case, any bank receiving the checks of the complainant for collection and remittance under the implied authority given to the Commercial Bank of Jasper when the deposit was made, held them as agent and in trus…