LARRY J. THOMAS, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Magda Sanchez K/N/A Magda Rodriguez v. Neymee Sanchez, 285 So. 3d 969 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)
  …Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.540(b)(4). The relevant portions of rule 12.540(b)(4) are identical to rule 1.540(b)(4), and motions filed under rule 12.540(b) are governed by the body of law applicable to rule 1.540(b). See Macar v. Macar, 803 So. 2d 707, 709 n.4 (Fla. 2001). For ease of reference, throughout this opinion, we will refer to the relevant motion simply as appellant’s rule 1.540(b)(4) motion, without reference to its family law rules counterpart. court case number FC15-24777). The Jun…
• Robinson v. Mitchel Kalmanson, 882 So. 2d 1086 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)
  …istence of his Former Wife’s reliance, we must reverse. See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So. 2d 40, 43 (Fla.1966); see also Lawrence v. Pep Boys—Manny Moe & Jack, Inc., 842 So. 2d 303, 304 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). The Former Husband argues that Macar v. Macar, 803 So. 2d 707 (Fla.2001), is dispositive. The Florida Supreme Court there held that in cases in which a marital settlement agreement is reached after the initiation of litigation and the completion of discovery, a party challenging the final judgment should not b…
• Kuchera v. Kuchera, 983 So. 2d 776 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)
  …may be challenged for fairness. But after litigation has been pursued, the governing standard for a settlement agreement is not the one employed in Casto. Litigation settlement agreements are judged, rather, by the later standard in Macar v. Macar, 803 So. 2d 707 (Fla.2001), and this court’s decision in Petracca v. Petracca, 706 So. 2d 904 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Macar holds that, when each party has been represented by chosen counsel and given an opportunity to learn the financial resources of the other throug…

Authorities Cited

• Guzman v. State, 644 So. 2d 996 (Fla. 1994)
• Thomas v. State, 725 So. 2d 1171 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)