ANTONIO LLAMPAY, APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, APPELLEE
ANTONIO LLAMPAY, APPELLANT,
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, APPELLEE
802 So. 2d 395
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. RApp. P. 9.315(a).
GUNTHER, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
M.W. v. State, 51 So. 3d 1220 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)…mments suggest that its finding was based on the conditional nature of the threat. But a conditional threat would not preclude a finding that M.W. had committed an assault. See State v. Smith, 348 So. 2d 637, 639 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977); K.E.H. v. State, 802 So. 2d 395, 396 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Blanton v. State, 388 So. 2d 1271, 1273 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).…
-
H.W. v. State, 79 So. 3d 143 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)…he victim. See, e.g., Johnson v. State, 888 So. 2d 691, 693 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (affirming conviction where the appellant pointed a gun at the victim and said, “F — , ni[ — ]er, I missed the first time, but I won’t miss this time”); K.E.H. v. State, 802 So. 2d 395, 396 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (affirming conviction on facts that “[w]hen his mother persisted, appellant put his fist in his mother’s face and said, ‘Leave me alone you f-ing bitch. I’m going to punch you in the f — ing face’ ”). The deficiency here is…
-
M.L. v. J.H.P. and B.N.P., 896 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)…ial evidence for the trial court to have found sufficient incidents of violence by battery and assault. Accordingly, the trial court’s rulings should be affirmed. See generally §§ 784.011(1), 784.03(l)(a)l„ Fla. Stat. [*960] (2003); K.E.H. v. State, 802 So. 2d 395 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Osrecovery, Inc. v. One Groupe Int’l, Inc., 2003 WL 23313, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Jan.3, 2003).…