GLENROY SALMON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2001-10-31
No. 3D01-2143
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and SORONDO, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
798 So. 2d 828 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We grant the motion for rehearing. As in Major v. State, 790 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), we certify that we have passed on the following question of great public importance:

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAS A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Castro v. State, 912 So. 2d 62 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
    …endant’s postconviction motion seeking additional credit for time served. See Render v. State, 802 So. 2d 512 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)(holding that the statutory “right to credit for time served may be waived as part of a plea bargain”); Griffin v. State, 798 So. 2d 828 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)(affirming order denying post-conviction motion where plea colloquy was “very specific that defendant was waiving any claim for credit for time served prior to sentencing”). Affirmed.…
  • Aguilar v. State, 47 So. 3d 956 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Griffin v. State, 798 So. 2d 828 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw