PERCIVAL D. JAMES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the summary denial of Appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Wood v. State, 750 So. 2d 592 (Fla.1999). Appellant fails to allege a meritorious claim in that he alleges absolutely no facts to support his claim. See Bartz v. State, 740 So. 2d 1243 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)(holding that generalized complaint is not legally sufficient to sustain a writ of error coram nobis, as it does not “allege specific facts of such a vital nature that, had they been known to the trial court, they conclusively would have prevented entry of judgment.”).
STONE, FARMER, and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Barnett v. Antonacci, 122 So. 3d 400 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)…of a ministerial act’ ” which is “where there is no room for the exercise of discretion, and the performance being required is directed by law.” Wright v. Frankel, 965 So. 2d 365, 370 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (quoting Shulmister v. City of Pompano Beach, 798 So. 2d 799, 802 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)). Here, no such “ministerial act” is implicated. Finally, the writ of quo war-ranto and the all writs provisions of the Florida Constitution are not applicable to this case. A writ of quo warranto “historically has been use…
-
Bd. OF Cnty. Comm'rs Broward Cnty. Fla. v. Parrish, 154 So. 3d 412 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)…n arising where there “ ‘is no room for the exercise of [the respondent’s] discretion, and the performance being required is directed by law.’ ” Wright v. Frankel, 965 So. 2d 365, 370 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (quoting Shulmister v. City of Pompano Beach, 798 So. 2d 799, 802 (Fla. [*418] 4th DCA 2001)). In the agency context, “official action is considered ministerial when it is arrived at as the result of the performance of a specific duty arising from legislatively designated facts.” Solomon v. Sanitarians’ Regis…
-
City OF Riviera Beach v. Riviera Beach Citizens Task Force, 87 So. 3d 18 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)…consider an otherwise proper referendum with proper ballot language and yet restrain the holding of this election on this basis where no enabling City Council resolution was specifically required. The City cites Shulmister v. City of Pompano Beach, 798 So. 2d 799 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), to support its contention that section 101.161 mandates that the governing body pass a resolution before a charter amendment may be placed on the ballot. In Shulmister, a petition for charter amendment was presented to the city…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Wood v. State, 750 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 1999)
- Bartz v. State, 740 So. 2d 1243 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)