LILIANA CAHUASQUI, PETITIONER,
v.
U.S. SECURITY INSURANCE CO., RESPONDENT
LILIANA CAHUASQUI, PETITIONER,
U.S. SECURITY INSURANCE CO., RESPONDENT
796 So. 2d 532
Florida Supreme Court (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We have for review U.S. Security Insurance Co. v. Cahuasqui, 760 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), based on apparent conflict with Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Pinnacle Medical, Inc., 753 So. 2d 55 (Fla.2000). Upon further review we have determined that conflict does not exist and that there is no other valid basis for jurisdiction here. Accordingly, the petition for review was improvidently granted and is hereby dismissed.
It is so ordered.
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tran v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 860 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)…suant to section 627.736, Florida Statutes, and to cases pending in small claims court. Nichols v. State Farm Mutual, 851 So. 2d 742 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); U.S. Security Insurance Co. v. Cahuasqui, 760 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), review dismissed, 796 So. 2d 532 (Fla.2001). We accordingly answer the certified questions in the affirmative. [*1001] We certify to the Florida Supreme Court, however, the following question as one of great public importance: May an insurer recover attorney’s fees under rule 1.442…
-
Nichols v. State Farm Mut., 851 So. 2d 742 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)…es filed in the courts of this state.” We agree with the holding, and generally agree with the reasoning, of our sister court in U.S. Security Insurance Co. v. Cahuasqui, 760 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), Rev. Dismissed as Improvidently Granted by 796 So. 2d 532 (Fla.2001), which addresses each of the points herein raised by the litigants and amicus curiae. Turning our attention to the second issue, we conclude that the proposal here was defective in form and content under rule 1.442, Florida Rule of Civil…
-
Diamond v. The Auto. Ins. Co. OF Hartford, 890 So. 2d 1248 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)…s order which struck The Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Ct.’s proposal for settlement in an action by the Diamonds under a valuable items policy. See U.S. Security Ins. Co. v. Cahuasqui, 760 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), rev. dismissed, 796 So. 2d 532 (Fla.2001)(The offer of judgment statute applies to all civil actions for damages.). The motion for clarification is denied. Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.…
Authorities Cited
- Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Pinnacle Med., Inc., 753 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 2000)
- Castano v. State, 760 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)
- U.S. Sec. Ins. Co. v. Liliana Cahuasqui, 760 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)