CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., APPELLANTS/CROSS-APPELLEES,
v.
GARRETT A. WISE, SR., SUSAN L. FLOWERS & ARETHA M. BADGLEY, ETC., APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS

Fla. 5th DCA | 2001-09-07
Nos. 5D00-954, 5D00-1393
THOMPSON, C.J., HARRIS and PALMER, JJ., concur.
792 So. 2d 1286 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2001)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the trial court's class certification order was devoid of required factual and legal findings.


Facts & Procedural History

Correctional Medical Services provided medical services and engaged Ilya Hathorn for dental services. Hathorn, who was not a licensed dentist, provide…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Correctional Medical Services, Inc. appeals an order granting in part certification of a class. Garrett A. Wise and the other plaintiffs cross-appeal the portion of the order granting certification.

Correctional Medical provided medical services in the Marion County jail. Correctional Medical engaged Ilya Hathorn, who provided dental services to the plaintiffs when they were incarcerated. It was later discovered that Hathorn was not a dentist, although Correctional Medical’s affidavit states that he showed Correctional Medical a license, a degree, and references. Hathorn pleaded nolo contendere to a charge of the unauthorized practice of dentistry.

This case is controlled by Braun v. Campbell, 781 So. 2d 480 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). The plaintiffs there had been treated by Hathorn when he was employed by Terry Braun, P.A., d/b/a Ocala Dental Care. They sued Braun under the same theories under which the plaintiffs in the instant case sued Correctional Medical. The trial court’s orders in the instant case and Braun are nearly verbatim. We held in Braun:

We agree with appellants that the trial court’s order is devoid of the factual and legal findings required by Rule 1.220(d)(1). As in KPMG Peat Marwick v. Barrier, 771 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), it is difficult to discern the court’s rationale for its order. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s certification order and remand for additional proceedings consistent with this opinion.

On the authority of Braun, the order of the trial court is REVERSED and the cause is REMANDED for further proceedings.

THOMPSON, C.J., HARRIS and PALMER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw