RAMONE GALARZA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2001-08-15
No. 2D01-1656
FULMER, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and GREEN, JJ„ Concur.
792 So. 2d 600 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2001) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Ramone Galarza appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct sentencing error filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm without prejudice to any right Galarza might have to file a motion pursuant to rule 3.850. See Drayton v. State, 786 So. 2d 1196 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

FULMER, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and GREEN, JJ„ Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Galarza v. State, 818 So. 2d 543 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)
    …resheet error in a motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to rule 3.800(a). This court affirmed the summary denial of that motion without prejudice to any right Galarza might have to file a motion pursuant to rule 3.850. Galarza v. State, 792 So. 2d 600 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Galarza then filed the instant rule 3.850 motion, but the trial court converted the motion to a rule 3.800(b)(2) motion and denied it. Galarza has made a facially sufficient claim that his trial counsel was ineffective. We reve…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw