A. RODOLFO BARRERA, JR., M.D., APPELLANT,
v.
COLUMBIA DEERING HOSPITAL, CORPORATION, APPELLEE
A. RODOLFO BARRERA, JR., M.D., APPELLANT,
COLUMBIA DEERING HOSPITAL, CORPORATION, APPELLEE
792 So. 2d 581
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See section 395.0191(7), Fla. Stat. (1997).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McPHEE v. State, 823 So. 2d 160 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)…sue. The Fourth District has held that such an allegation could form the basis for relief. See Jones v. State, 814 So. 2d 446 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Smith v. State, 784 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). The Second District disagrees. See Horne v. State, 792 So. 2d 581, 582 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001), certifying conflict with Smith. We have aligned ourselves with the Second District in that when counsel misinforms his client of the potential sentence-enhancing consequences of his plea, it is a collateral consequence which…
-
Cifuentes v. State, 816 So. 2d 804 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)…ssue. The Fourth District has held that such an allegation could form the basis for relief. See Jones v. State, 814 So. 2d 446 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Smith v. State, 784 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). The Second District disagrees. See Home v. State, 792 So. 2d 581, 582 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001), certifying conflict with Smith. We have aligned ourselves with the Second District in that when counsel misinforms his client of the potential sentence-enhancing consequences of his plea, it is a collateral consequence which…