THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
MONSERRATE RODRIGUEZ, APPELLEE
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
MONSERRATE RODRIGUEZ, APPELLEE
790 So. 2d 1272
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion and properly evaluated the four factors enumerated in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 530, 92 S.Ct. 2182, 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972)(holding that four of the factors that courts should assess in determining whether a particular defendant has been deprived of his right to a speedy trial are length of delay, the reason for the delay, the defendant’s assertion of his right, and prejudice to the defendant), to determine whether a constitutional speedy trial violation had occurred.
Accordingly, we affirm.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gonzalez v. State, 905 So. 2d 208 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)…514, 92 S.Ct. 2182, 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972); Brown v. State, 515 So. 2d 211 (Fla.1987); State v. Bivona, 496 So. 2d 130 (Fla.1986); Ferris v. State, 475 So. 2d 201 (Fla.1985); State v. Jenkins, 899 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); State v. Rodriguez, 790 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). . Of course, the federal court was free itself to order the appellant’s release on an equivalent of habeas corpus if it felt that the state had violated the letter or spirit of its original order requiring a new trial. It did…
Authorities Cited
- Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (U.S. 1972)