MARK R. LANIER, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MARK R. LANIER, JR., APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
789 So. 2d 520
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges the order by which the trial judge denied his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. One of the appellant’s claims is that he involuntarily entered his pleas out of a well-founded fear that his counsel would be unprepared at trial. Because this claim is colorable and not conclusively refuted by the attachments to the order, the denial of the claim is reversed and this case is remanded for further consideration of the claim. The order is otherwise affirmed.
ALLEN, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hinson v. State, 220 So. 3d 1242 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)…is colorable and not conclusively refuted by the attachments to the order, we reverse the denial of this claim and remand for further consideration of this claim only. E.g., Green v. State, 827 So. 2d 1060, 1061 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Lanier v. State, 789 So. 2d 520, 521 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), We otherwise affirm the order. REVERSED in part arid REMANDED. WETHERELL, MAKAR, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.…