CORPORATE SECURITIES GROUP, INC., PETITIONER,
v.
SHIRLEY LIND, RESPONDENT
CORPORATE SECURITIES GROUP, INC., PETITIONER,
SHIRLEY LIND, RESPONDENT
789 So. 2d 340
Florida Supreme Court (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted review of the decision in Corporate Securities Group, Inc. v. Lind, 753 So. 2d 151 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), based on alleged express and direct conflict under article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution. Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review of this cause.
It is so ordered.
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gudinas v. State, 879 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 2004)…592, 594 (Fla.2001); Barnes v. State, 794 So. 2d 590, 592 (Fla.2001); Smith v. State, 793 So. 2d 889, 891 (Fla.2001); Marshall v. [*619] State, 789 So. 2d 969, 970-71 (Fla.2001); McDowell v. State, 789 So. 2d 956, 957 (Fla.2001); Sheffield v. State, 789 So. 2d 340, 342 (Fla.2001); Balkcom v. State, 789 So. 2d 949, 950-51 (Fla.2000). Notwithstanding the recidivist exception in Apprendi, and our application of that exception to Florida’s PRR Act, this Court has consistently ruled that the habitual offender sta…
-
KEY v. State, 837 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)…t of victim injury points is contra to Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), because the issue has not been preserved for review. See Marshall v. State, 789 So. 2d 969, 970 (Fla.2001); Sheffield v. State, 789 So. 2d 340 (Fla.2001). . It should be noted that the jury was erroneously given an instruction on child abuse that included the element of “great bodily harm.” On direct appeal, this court recognized that the instruction was given in error, but concluded that…
Authorities Cited
- Corporate Sec. Grp. v. Lind, 753 So. 2d 151 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)