VIGIL BIRCH, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
VIGIL BIRCH, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
787 So. 2d 962
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the denial of defendant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. This affir-mance is without prejudice to defendant presenting his claim for gain time administratively to the Department of Corrections, and, if unsuccessful, thereafter filing a petition for writ of mandamus. See Baez v. State, 780 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Allen v. State, 768 So. 2d 1168 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Allen v. State, 768 So. 2d 1168 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)
- Bethea v. State, 780 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
- Wilfredo Baez v. State, 780 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)