EARL L. NEWSOME, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 2001-05-31
No. SC00-633
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, and PARIENTE, JJ., concur., QUINCE, J., dissents.
787 So. 2d 831 Florida Supreme Court (2001) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, J.

LEWIS, J.

We have for review Newsome v. State, 779 So. 2d 351 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We vacate the decision of the district court and remand for reconsideration upon application of our decisions in Grant v. State, 770 So. 2d 655 (Fla.2000); State v. Cotton, 769 So. 2d 345 (Fla.2000); McKnight v. State, 769 So. 2d 1039 (Fla.2000); and Ellis v. State, 762 So. 2d 912 (Fla.2000).

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, and PARIENTE, JJ., concur. QUINCE, J., dissents.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Brooks v. State, 790 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
    …HARRIS, J. Pursuant to the mandate in Brooks v. State, 787 So. 2d 831 (Fla.2001), we reconsider our previous opinion, Brooks v. State, 753 So. 2d 776 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), in light of Grant v. State, 770 So. 2d 655 (Fla.2000); State v. Cotton, 769 So. 2d 345 (Fla.2000); McKnight v. State, 769 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. 2000); a…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw