GIVEN IN LOVE ADOPTIONS, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
JASON BALL, APPELLEE
GIVEN IN LOVE ADOPTIONS, INC., APPELLANT,
JASON BALL, APPELLEE
786 So. 2d 651
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Having considered the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of April 30, 2001, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The appellant’s request for certiorari relief is denied.
BARFIELD, C.J., KAHN and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pierson v. State, 801 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)…attach portions of the record conclusively refuting the appellant’s allegations that he was not awarded credit for the initial time served on the incarcerative portion of his “split sentence,” or to grant the requested relief. See Robinson v. State, 786 So. 2d 651 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Layman v. State, 787 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). REVERSED and REMANDED. MINER, WOLF and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.…
-
Waco Linn Allums v. State, 802 So. 2d 1196 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)…’s motion, stating only that his claim is incognizable via a rule 3.800 motion. Because “[a] claim for additional credit is cognizable in a rule 3.800 motion,” the trial court was incorrect in denying the appellant’s motion. See Robinson v. State, 786 So. 2d 651 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)(eiting State v. Mancino, 714 So. 2d 429, 433 (Fla. 1998) for the proposition that “credit time issues are cognizable in a rule 3.800 motion when it is affirmatively alleged that the court records demonstrate on their face an enti…