ISAAC BROWN, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Patchen v. State of Fla. Dep't OF Agric. & Consumer Servs., 817 So. 2d 854 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
  …e. A record on appeal is an oxymoron. There is no record. Hence there is no meaningful appeal. We find that situation unacceptable as a matter of law, policy, and principle, yet we must affirm. Markus v. Department of Agriculture & Consumer Servs., 785 So. 2d 595, 596 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). This court held that the affirmance was “without prejudice to bring an action for inverse condemnation, or to seek such other relief as they deem appropriate.” Id. Our suggestion was well-intentioned but perhaps ill-advised.…
• Meszaros v. Dep't of Agric. & Consumer Servs., 861 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
  …ssuing the IFO because their citrus trees constitute an acceptable level of risk. The standard for reviewing this order is whether the IFO was “lawfully entered” and “not defective.” Markus v. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 785 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Sapp Farms, Inc. v. Florida Dep’t of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 761 So. 2d 347 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). We note at the outset that the Meszaroses do not contest whether the IFO was lawfully entered and not defective. They al…
• Melvyn Greenstein v. Fla. Dep't of Agric. & Consumer Servs., 795 So. 2d 160 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Markus v. Florida Dept. of Agriculture, 785 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999)