HONORE WESBERT, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
HONORE WESBERT, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
782 So. 2d 545
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s decision revoking defendant’s probation. However, as the State acknowledges, the trial court’s written Order of Probation Violation does not conform to the oral pronouncements made by the trial judge at the time that the probation was revoked. Accordingly, while we affirm the revocation of probation, we remand the cause to the trial court with directions to enter an Order of Revocation that conforms to the' trial judge’s oral pronouncements. See Suarez v. State, 761 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)
Affirmed and remanded with directions.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sigifredo Benitez v. State, 57 So. 3d 939 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)…This analysis makes it unnecessary to address the defendant’s second claim of error, a point which the State here concedes, that the trial court’s written Order of Probation Violation did not conform to its oral pronouncements. See Wesbert v. State, 782 So. 2d 545 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Suarez v. State, 761 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Masis v. State, 758 So. 2d 1290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Salvatierra, v. State, 691 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). [*942] Accordingly, the revocation of probation is reversed and the…
Authorities Cited
- Suarez v. State, 761 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)
- Mitchell v. State, 761 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)