RALPH MORIARTY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2001-03-16
No. 5D00-3714
PETERSON, PALMER and ORFINGER, R. B., JJ., concur.
779 So. 2d 657 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2001) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

On the court’s own motion, Appellant, Ralph Moriarty, was required to show cause why his untimely appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. This court appointed the Honorable Robert K. Mathis as commissioner of this court to conduct a hearing to determine if a late appeal should be authorized. Having considered the report of the commissioner, we conclude that Moriarty’s untimeliness was due to excusable neglect on the part of his attorney and the fault of the United States Postal Service. Accordingly, we authorize Moriarty’s belated appeal.

We have reviewed the circuit court’s order denying Moriarty’ relief pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm the circuit court’s order denying 3.850 relief.

AFFIRMED.

PETERSON, PALMER and ORFINGER, R. B., JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Longley v. State, 811 So. 2d 709 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)
    …the denial of Longley’s 3.800(a) Motion To Correct Illegal Sentence, review the order on the merits, and affirm. See Carter v. State, 786 So. 2d 1173 (Fla.2001); Edwards v. State, 760 So. 2d 226, 227 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); see also Moriarty v. State, 779 So. 2d 657 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Donovan v. State, 773 So. 2d 1264 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). PETITION GRANTED; AFFIRMED. THOMPSON, C.J., SAWAYA and ORFINGER, R.B., JJ., concur.…
  • Aguila v. Rqm+ LLC (S.D. Fla. 2025)
    …a defendant challenges the applicability of the substitute service statutes by affidavit or other proof, the plaintiff must then demonstrate sufficient evidence to bring the defendant within the purview of the statutes. See, e.g., Gower v. Hemmerle, 779 So. 2d 657, 658 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (reversing denial of motion to quash service where "by affidavit [defendant] made a showing that he was not amenable to service under sections 48.161 and 48.171" and plaintiff 9 ---PAGE 10--- failed to carry burden in respo…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw