BENJAMIN DELASHMUTT, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Roque v. Paskow, 812 So. 2d 500 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)
  …ew benefit for one party. See Dickinson v. Dickinson, 746 So. 2d 1253, 1254 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). On the other hand, a clarification does not seek to change rights and obligations but to make a judgment more clear and precise. See Fussell v. Fussell, 778 So. 2d 517, 518 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). Finally, the construction of a final judgment presents a question of law for the court, see Boynton v. Canal Auth., 311 So. 2d 412, 415 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), and we may review it de novo on appeal. As we read the original f…
• Pomeranz v. Ina T. Pomeranz, 961 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
  …eks a new benefit for one party. Dickinson v. Dickinson, 746 So. 2d 1253, 1254 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). On the other hand, a clarification does not seek to change rights and obligations, but to make a judgment more clear and precise. Fussell v. Fussell, 778 So. 2d 517, 518 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). In order for the trial court to modify a final judgment, the moving party must present the issue by appropriate pleadings. McDonald v. McDonald, 732 So. 2d 505, 506 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). To obtain modification, a party must…
• Bustamante v. O'Brien, 286 So. 3d 352 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)
  …to make a judgment clearer and more precise, as opposed to a modification, which seeks to change the status quo and alter the rights and obligations of the parties. Roque v. Paskow, 812 So. 2d 500, 503 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (citing Fussell v. Fussell, 778 So. 2d 517, 518 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), and Dickinson v. Dickinson, 746 So. 2d 1253, 1254 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)). To obtain a modification, a party must show a substantial change in circumstances necessitating the modification together with a determination that the…

Authorities Cited

• Gissendanner v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1979)
• Robinson v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1979)
• Leonard v. State, 760 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 2000)