ESTATE OF CARL DANIEL GOLDENBERG, APPELLANT,
v.
EUNICE GOLDEN AND ROBIN GOLDEN POLTE, APPELLEES
ESTATE OF CARL DANIEL GOLDENBERG, APPELLANT,
EUNICE GOLDEN AND ROBIN GOLDEN POLTE, APPELLEES
777 So. 2d 1079
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Curtiss v. McCall, 224 So. 2d 354, 357 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969)(“[A]s between different states jurisdiction of the estate depends upon decedent’s domicile at the time of death or upon the location of his property, or both.”), cert. dismissed, 237 So. 2d 533 (Fla.1970); Biederman v. Cheatham, 161 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 2d DCA)(same), cert. denied, 168 So. 2d 146 (Fla.1964).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- In re Est. of Edward Biederman v. Cheatham, 161 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)
- Weinfeld v. Fla. Indus. Comm'n, 168 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 1964)
- Leverette v. Carter, 168 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 1964)
- Curtiss v. Mahlon C. McCALL and M. M. Gibson, 224 So. 2d 354 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969)
- Wheeler v. Nelson, 237 So. 2d 533 (Fla. 1970)
- Bivins v. State, 237 So. 2d 533 (Fla. 1970)