WM. H. SCHRUBEN ET AL., ETC., APPELLANTS,
v.
OLIVE H. JOHNSON, APPELLEE
WM. H. SCHRUBEN ET AL., ETC., APPELLANTS,
OLIVE H. JOHNSON, APPELLEE
94 Fla. 204
Florida Supreme Court (1927)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed. Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Strum and Brown, J. J., concur. Buford, J., disqualified.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cook v. Pontious, 98 Fla. 373 (Fla. 1929)…ning the equity of the bill, we cannot say that the allegations of the answers were wholly insufficient as an affirmative defense to the bill in the instant case, for reasons set forth farther on in this opinion. In the ease of Schruben v. Johnson, 94 Fla. 204, 113 So. R. 640, decided July 13, 1927, we affirmed, per curiam, a decree striking an answer very similar to the answers in the instant case, and were it not for the fact that in December, 1927, we rendered an opinion, holding that a bill of complai…