STANLEY MACKOWIAK, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
GRANVILLE E. NOBLIT, JR., DEFENDANT IN ERROR

Fla. | 1927-04-18
93 Fla. 931 Florida Supreme Court (1927) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell, and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Kennedy v. City of Daytona Beach, 132 Fla. 675 (Fla. 1938)
    …f were committed in the exercise of some corporate power or in the performance of some duty imposed upon the municipality by law and' that it is not liable for the unlawful or prohibitive acts of its officers or agents.” See Brown v. Town of Eustis, 93 Fla. 931, 110 Sou. 873, and cases there cited. In 43 C. J. 964, paragraph 1745, the principle involved is stated thus: “When, by the action of the State, a municipal corporation is charged with the preservation of the peace, and empowered to appoint police…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw