STANLEY WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
STANLEY WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
769 So. 2d 479
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s denial of Stanley Williams’ motion to correct sentence pursuant to Rule 3.800(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, because the alleged sentencing error is not readily ascertainable from the face of the record. See Holland v. State, 672 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 678 So. 2d 338 (Fla.1996).
Our affirmance is without prejudice, thereby allowing Williams to file a legally sufficient Rule 3.850 motion if he can do so in a timely manner. AFFIRMED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
HARRIS, PETERSON and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gaynor v. State, 831 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)…endant’s claim that scoresheet was not properly calculated involved issues which could not be determined from the face of the record and would require evidentiary hearing, so trial court correctly denied 3.800(a) motion). See also Williams v. State, 769 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). AFFIRMED. COBB and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur. . See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800.…
Authorities Cited
- Holland v. State, 672 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)