YOHANY SIGLER, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2000-08-16
No. 3D00-2079
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ.
768 So. 2d 1125 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Dunenas v. Moore, 762 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …), as he is a licensed attorney in the state of Missouri. Furthermore, the attorney-client privilege protects communications on legal matters between corporate in-house counsel and corporate employees. See Tomkins Indus., Inc. v. Warren Tech., Inc., 768 So. 2d 1125, 1126 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (holding that a communication between corporate counsel and corporate employees is protected if the communication concerns legal advice in view of a contentious relationship and in anticipation of litigation). Our review o…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw