DAVID DALLAS GEORGE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DAVID DALLAS GEORGE, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
767 So. 2d 1267
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Caruso v. State, 645 So. 2d 389 (Fla.1994); Parker v. State, 570 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Mills v. State, 407 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Brocca, 842 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)…497 U.S. 805, [*292] 110 S.Ct. 3139, 111 L.Ed.2d 638 (1990). The same conclusion — that the statute is constitutional — follows from Conner v. State, 748 So. 2d 950 (Fla.1999). Second, the majority opinion is also in conflict with Felder v. State, 767 So. 2d 1267 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), as relates to a hearsay declarant who testifies in court. I. The State has charged defendant-respondent Daniel Brocea with two counts of sexual battery on a mentally defective person over the age of twelve years. See § 794.011(…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Caruso v. State, 645 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 1994)
- Mills v. State, 407 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- Parker v. State, 570 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)