STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, APPELLANT,
v.
C & W FOOD SERVICE, INC., APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2000-09-25
No. 1D99-4160
BOOTH, MINER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.
767 So. 2d 1262 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2000)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the basis for awarding attorney's fees no longer exists after a prior reversal of damages.


Facts & Procedural History

The trial court awarded attorney's fees to C & W Food Service based on damages exceeding their settlement offer. The Department of Corrections appeale…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The Department of Corrections appeals from an order awarding attorney’s fees to appellee below. We reverse.

The trial court below entered final summary judgment in favor of appellee C & W Food Service, Inc., and awarded damages for lost profits in the action for breach of contract. The Department appealed that order (C & W I) to this court. Because of DOC’s rejection of its previous offer of settlement and the damages awarded by the trial court, C & W sought attorney’s fees pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.442 and section 768.79, Florida Statutes. Finding that the damage award exceeded the settlement proposal by at least 25 percent, the trial court entered an order awarding C & W attorney’s fees. The Department then separately appealed that order, which is before us in the instant ease (C & W II).

This court recently issued an opinion in C & W I in which we reversed the final summary judgment’s award of damages. See 765 So. 2d 728 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Mandate in that case issued on August 25, 2000. Accordingly, the basis for the award of attorney’s fees to C & W below no longer exists, and we reverse the trial court’s order here appealed.

BOOTH, MINER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw