JOHN F. CURRY, JR., PETITIONER,

v.

FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• Smith v. Fla. Dep't OF Corr., 920 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)
  …June 1998. See Fla. Admin. Code Ann. r. 33-501.302 (2005) (setting forth amendment history of the rule). As it existed at the time the petition for declaratory judgment was filed in this case, the rule was described by this court in Newell v. Moore, 767 So. 2d 1240 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), as follows: Both the 1998 and current versions of the inmate copying service rule contain five sections that outline how photocopying will be conducted in prison institutions. [Section two] states: Documents will be copied onl…
• Rivera v. State, 805 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
  …elief. He then requested, without ever stating the relief he [*22] was seeking, that we grant his petition. A petition for writ of mandamus must allege a violation of a clear legal right and the breach of an indisputable legal duty. Newell v. Moore, 767 So. 2d 1240 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Rivera did not allege the violation of a clear legal right or the breach of an indisputable legal duty. The petition was denied by order of this court dated November 13, 2000. As was the case with Rivera’s prior petitions, the p…
• Bishop v. Moore, 848 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
  …a talisman medallion from the prison canteen. Therefore, he has failed to demonstrate that there has been a violation of a clear legal right and a corresponding breach by the Department of Corrections of an indisputable legal duty. Newell v. Moore, 767 So. 2d 1240 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). However, we would note that Bishop’s confusion is understandable, as it appears from the record that he was given either incorrect or incomplete answers to his requests for instructions regarding the proper method to order the m…

Authorities Cited

• Brown v. Campion, 757 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)