FLORIDA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, INC., FLORIDA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS, INC., FLORIDA ACADEMY OF COSMETIC SURGEONS, INC., FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF NURSE ANESTHETISTS, INC., FLORIDA SURGEONS FORUM, INC., FLORIDA SURGICAL SOCIETY, INC., PETITIONERS,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, FLORIDA BOARD OF MEDICINE, RESPONDENT
FLORIDA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, INC., FLORIDA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS, INC., FLORIDA ACADEMY OF COSMETIC SURGEONS, INC., FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF NURSE ANESTHETISTS, INC., FLORIDA SURGEONS FORUM, INC., FLORIDA SURGICAL SOCIETY, INC., PETITIONERS,
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, FLORIDA BOARD OF MEDICINE, RESPONDENT
766 So. 2d 406
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Petitioners challenge emergency rule 64BER00-1, which imposes a moratorium on Level III office surgery. We have jurisdiction. §§ 120.54(4)(a)3.; 120.68(1); Fla. R.App. 9.100(a). We find that the emergency rule complies with section 120.54(4), Florida Statutes. Accordingly, the petition for review of non-final administrative action and petitioners’ requests for other relief are hereby denied.
ERVIN, WOLF and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Encarnacion v. Encarnacion, 877 So. 2d 960 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)…g to review and the presumption is there was competent evidence to support the trial court’s rulings. See Paul v. Charles, 816 So. 2d 837 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Prymus v. Prymus, 753 So. 2d 742 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Autustin v. Dade County School Board, 766 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). However, if the trial court lacks jurisdiction to act, based on the record before this court, relief may be provided. See Fortune v. Pantin, 851 So. 2d 274 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Casella v. Casella, 569 So. 2d 848, 849 (Fla. 4th DC…
-
Engram v. Ashton M. Bryan, 779 So. 2d 586 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)…ourt would normally be unable to determine whether the trial court erred in concluding that Engram failed to establish excusable neglect. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla.1979); Autustin v. Dade County School Board, 766 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). However, where issues of child custody are involved, appellate courts have strongly discouraged trial courts from using a default as the mechanism for effecting a change in custody. See, e.g., McEwen v. Rodriguez, 766 So. 2d 316…