DOUGLAS M. JACKSON, SR., APPELLANT,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• In re Standard Jury Instructions IN Crim. Cases (NO.2005-5), 939 So. 2d 1052 (Fla. 2006)
  …itted with the amended report were relatively insignificant, the versions attached to the amended report were not separately published. . With regard to the proposed version of instruction 3.6(a), the Court deleted the citation to Wallace v. State, 766 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). It also deleted the words "or conviction" from the proposed additional language defining the clear and convincing evidence standard to avoid the possibility of confusion with the standard for conviction of a crime, the beyond a r…
• Lamb v. McNEIL, 41 So. 3d 964 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)
  …question of whether the trial court erred in excluding the test results. Appellate counsel could [*966] rightfully have declined to raise this issue, because any error would have been harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. See, e.g., Wallace v. State, 766 So. 2d 364, 372 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (finding error harmless because the excluded testimony was cumulative of other evidence presented to the jury); Billeaud v. State, 578 So. 2d 343, 344-45 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (error in excluding testimony tending to show that…
• Rodriguez v. State, 172 So. 3d 540 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015)
  …n should only be given for offenses that allegedly occurred before June 19, 2000, the trial court relied on three cases: (1) Cruse v. State, 588 So. 2d 983 (Fla.1991); (2) Turner v. State, 809 So. 2d 59 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); and (3) Wallace v. State, 766 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). In each of those cases, the trial court gave a hallucinations instruction similar to the one in the instant case. Cruse, 588 So. 2d at 989; Turner, 809 So. 2d at 61; Wallace, 766 So. 2d at 368. [*545] However, the offenses in eac…

Authorities Cited

• Ruiz v. MacHin, 753 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)
• Jackson v. Dep't OF Corr., 753 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)