GREGORY COLLINS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
GREGORY COLLINS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
765 So. 2d 121
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Gregory D. Collins appeals his sentences on violation of probation for offenses occurring on March 13, 1997. The sentences were imposed pursuant to the 1995 sentencing guidelines. We remand this case to the trial court to reconsider the sentences imposed for counts one and two. See Smith v. State, 761 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).
ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
de Vaux v. Westwood Baptist Church, 953 So. 2d 677 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)…e minds.” Central Props., Inc. v. Robbinson, 450 So. 2d 277, 280 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), modified on other grounds, [*682] 468 So. 2d 986 (Fla.1985); accord Irby v. Mem’l Healthcare Group,- Inc., 901 So. 2d 305, 306 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Allen v. Berry, 765 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); Drost v. Hill, 639 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); 777 Flagler Co. v. Amerifirst Bank, 559 So. 2d 1210 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Balter v. Pan Am. Bank of Hialeah, 383 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Brown v. Dobry, 311 So. 2d 159 (Fla…
-
King v. Bray, 867 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)…unenforceable because, based on an ambiguity in the contract, the parties never reached a meeting of the minds regarding an essential term of the agreement. See Cavallaro v. Stratford Homes, Inc., 784 So. 2d 619 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Allen v. Berry, 765 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), review denied, 786 So. 2d 1183 (Fla.2001). Regarding the issue whether the contract is ambiguous, the underlying rationale of the argument presented by the Kings is that 38 U.S.C. § 3702(b) provides for the return of a VA certif…
-
Smith v. Babcock (Fla. 6th DCA 2023)…t has yet to occur. The disputed evidence concerning the terms of the parties’ purported agreement calls into question whether there was a meeting of the minds and, thus, an enforceable agreement to immediately remove the dock. See Allen v. Berry, 765 So. 2d 121, 122 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (“Where it appears that the parties are continuing to negotiate as to essential terms of an agreement, there can be no meeting of the minds.”); Suggs v. Defranco’s, Inc., 626 So. 2d 1100, 1101 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (“Where ess…
Authorities Cited
- Smith v. State, 761 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)