TRAVORIS LAMAR GEORGE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Collateral Relief cases and more on FLexlaw
W. SHARP, J.
George appeals from the final summary denial of his third motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.1 We warn George further appeals are improper and successive.2
Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel cannot be raised in a piecemeal fashion.3 Nor can George raise as grounds for collateral relief, through future rule 3.850 motions, grounds which he could have, but failed to raise on appeal or in his first 3.850 motion.4
AFFIRMED.
PETERSON and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.
. See George v. State, 753 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); George v. State, 743 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999).
. See Orr v. State, 691 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).
. See Jones v. State, 591 So. 2d 911 (Fla.1991); Young v. State, 724 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999).
.See Harvey v. Dugger, 656 So. 2d 1253 (Fla.1995); Zeigler v. State, 654 So. 2d 1162 (Fla.1995).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Travoris Lamar George v. State, 840 So. 2d 1172 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)…for a writ of habeas corpus. We deny the writ. When this court affirmed the summary denial of his third Rule 3.850 motion in 2000, we expressly warned George that further attacks upon his conviction would be improper and successive. George v. State, 764 So. 2d 905 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), cause dismissed, 837 So. 2d 409 (Fla.2003). Undaunted, George again asserts the same evidentiary claim he has raised several times before. Because his claim had been rejected on the merits both at the trial court level and in…
-
Ford v. State, 856 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)…PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Spencer v. State, 842 So. 2d 52 (Fla.2003); Vining v. State, 827 So. 2d 201 (Fla.2002); George v. State, 764 So. 2d 905 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), case dismissed, 837 So. 2d 409 (Fla.2003). SHARP, W., GRIFFIN and PALMER, JJ., concur.…
-
Fla. Dep't OF Corr. v. Schwarz, 96 So. 3d 480 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)…PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Bracey v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 764 So. 2d 905, 905 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (“PERC was required to affirm the factual findings of negligence made by the hearing officer if such findings are supported by competent substantial evidence.”); Crawley v. Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 616 So. 2…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Jones v. State, 591 So. 2d 911 (Fla. 1991)
- Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
- Harvey v. Dugger, 656 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. 1995)
- Zeigler v. State, 654 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 1995)
- Young v. State, 724 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)
- ORR v. State, 691 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)
- Hand v. State, 691 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)