VANREA J. BROOKS, APPELLANT,
v.
SUZANNE SHORE, ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 2000-06-28
No. 3D99-2500
Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and GREEN, JJ.
760 So. 2d 1093 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*1094] PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Mendelsund v. Southern-Aire Coats of Florida, Inc., 210 So. 2d 229, 231 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968) (“Generally, there is a presumption that an attorney, as an officer of the court, is duly authorized to act for a client whom he professes to represent. In the absence of some pleading questioning the attorney’s acts ..., the presumption is conclusive.”).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Agean Invs. Ltd. v. Ramos, 783 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Brooks v. Shore, 760 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. 3d DCA2000).…
  • Jensen v. Sierra Grill, Inc., 876 So. 2d 1264 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)
    …a presumption that an attorney, as an officer of the court, is duly authorized to act for a client whom he professes to represent. In the absence of some pleading questioning the attorney’s acts ..., the presumption is conclusive.” Brooks v. Shore, 760 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)(quoting Mendelsund v. Southern-Aire Coats of Florida, Inc., 210 So. 2d 229, 231 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)). In Allbritton v. Stahlman, 683 So. 2d 536 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996), however, the Court recognized that the presumption may be overcome…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw