NESTOR J. CALDERA, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
NESTOR J. CALDERA, APPELLANT,
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
758 So. 2d 736
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Nestor J. Caldera appeals the denial of unemployment benefits. For the following reason, we affirm.
Because the 20-day appeal period is jurisdictional, the Unemployment Appeals Commission properly dismissed the appeal as untimely. See § 443.151(4)(b)3, Fla. Stat. (1999) (referee’s decision is final unless within 20 days, the claimant seeks review by the Unemployment Appeals Commission); Fla. Admin. Code R. 38E-3.006 (“An application for review which is not filed within the time allowed by law shall be dismissed by the Commission for lack of jurisdiction.”).
AFFIRMED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Alvarez v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Comm'n (Fla. 3d DCA 2024)…therine Mirella Area Alvarez, in proper person. Amanda L. Neff, Deputy General Counsel (Tallahassee), for appellee. Before LINDSEY, GORDO, and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. 2 Affirmed. See Caldera v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Com’n, 758 So. 2d 736, 736 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (“Because the 20-day appeal period is jurisdictional, the Unemployment Appeals Commission properly dismissed the appeal as untimely.”); see also § 443.151(4)(b)(3), Fla. Stat. (2023) (“If an appeal appears to have been fil…