MERLAN DAVIS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2000-05-05
No. 2D99-548
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and BLUE, J., Concur.
758 So. 2d 724 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
SALCINES, Judge.

SALCINES, Judge.

Merlán Davis has filed an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order holding him in civil contempt. This court has held that prejudgment civil contempt orders are more properly reviewed by certiorari. See Knorr v. Knorr, 751 So. 2d 64 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Accordingly, this appeal is treated as a petition for writ of certiorari which is denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari denied.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and BLUE, J., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Caruso v. Super Vision Int'l, Inc., 845 So. 2d 947 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
    …maintain that the orders either determine the right to immediate possession of property or granted or modified an injunction. We disagree. The record establishes that the trial court’s orders are not appealable under rule 9.130. See Davis v. State, 758 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (explaining that prejudgment civil contempt orders are more properly reviewed by certiorari); see also Sears v. Sears, 617 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Stewart v. Mussoline, 487 So. 2d 96 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Compare Alves v. Ba…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw