JAMES W. WARREN AND G. C. WARREN, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
TAMPA MORTGAGE INVESTORS CO., A CORPORATION, ET AL. DEFENDANTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This case involves a request for a supersedeas to stay a circuit court's order that dismissed a bill of complaint and rescinded a temporary restraining order. The Supreme Court denied the supersedeas, finding the circuit court acted correctly.
The Supreme Court denied the motion for supersedeas. The circuit court's order rescinding the temporary restraining order was not in error because the restraining order was initially issued without proper notice.
“It is thereupon ordered, adjudged and decreed: ( “1. That the temporary restraining order heretofore issued in this cause without notice or hearing be and the same is hereby rescinded.”
This quote establishes the circuit court's action of rescinding the temporary restraining order.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePlaintiffs sought a temporary injunction and a restraining order against the defendant. The circuit court initially issued a temporary restraining ord…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Temporary Restraining Order cases and more on FLexlaw
This case being presented to me as one of the Justices of the Supreme Court of Florida for an Order of Supersedeas to that certain Order entered by the Honorable L. L. Parks, Circuit Judge of the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida, on- the 10th day of February, A. D. 1933, as follows:
“This cause came on this day to be heard upon the motion of the defendant, Tampa Mortgage Investors Co., to'dismiss the bill of complaint, and the Court finding that the plaintiffs are not entitled to any temporary injunction and that the bill of complaint states no case for any equitable relief against the defendant, Tampa Mortgage Investors Co., and the Court being fully advised.
“It is thereupon ordered, adjudged and decreed:
( “1. That the temporary restraining order heretofore issued in this cause without notice or hearing be and the same is hereby rescinded.
“2. That the bill of complaint be and the same is hereby dismissed as to the defendant, Tampa Mortgage Investors Co., at the cost of the plaintiffs.
“Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed at Tampa, Florida, this 10th day of February, A. D. 1933.”
It appearing that the Order to which supersedeas is sought is that which rescinded the temporary restraining order theretofore issued, which restraining order was issued without notice or hearing as is required by Section 3176 R. G. S. 4968 C. G. L. The motion for supersedeas having been presented and argued by counsel for the respective, parties, *437I am of the opinion that -the Order made by the Circuit Judge rescinding the temporary restraining Order theretofore issued without notice was without error because of the fact that the restraining order had been issued in violation of the provisions of the statute above referred to. The Order of supersedeas could effectuate no useful purpose unless it was so' framed as to reinstate and leave in force and effect the temporary restraining order above réferred to and as this-order was issued as above stated it should not be reinstated by the action of this Court.
The motion for supersedeas is denied.