PAUL MILES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2000-03-08
No. 4D00-213
STEVENSON, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
752 So. 2d 1247 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2000)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of Paul Miles’ post-conviction motion. We note that the motion alleged that Miles had filed a public records request that was still pending when the motion was filed. In the event that his request leads to newly discovered facts within the meaning of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(b)(1), affirmance would be without prejudice to file a new motion based on that information. See Buenoano v. State, 708 So. 2d 941 (Fla.), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1043, 118 S.Ct. 1358, 140 L.Ed.2d 507 (1998).

STEVENSON, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw