DAVID N. SHANK, APPELLANT,
v.
WILL STANLEY, ET AL, APPELLEE

Fla. | 1926-03-10
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
91 Fla. 439 Florida Supreme Court (1926) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Tilman v. Niemira, 99 Fla. 833 (Fla. 1930)
    …agent, Mr. Back, he offered defendant a quitclaim deed for $2500.00, but that he did not know either of these men prior to that time and both being strangers to him, he did not want to take sides in any controversy. In the case of Worrell v. Ford, 91 Fla. 439, 109 So. R. 440, this Court held that: “In an, action of ejectment, it may be shown under the general issue whether at the time a conveyance of land, was made, a portion of the land covered by the deed of conveyance was adversely held by another, s…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw