BEATE ROSWITHA WOLF, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the written sentence for driving with a suspended license must conform to the oral pronouncement, but that failure to object to other cost impositions waives appellate review.
The written sentence imposed probation and costs for testing procedures, differing from the oral sentence. The defendant did not timely object to the …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Written Judgment cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Beate Roswitha Wolf was orally sentenced to time served for driving with a suspended license, but the written version of the sentence imposed a six month period of probation. Additionally, the written sentence varied from the oral sentence for other counts by imposing the burden of paying the costs of urinalysis, breathalyzer and/or blood tests, and any other tests ordered by a drug treatment center. The state agrees that the written sentence for driving with a suspended license should be changed to conform to the sentence orally imposed at the sentencing hearing. The written sentence imposed for driving with a suspended license is vacated and we remand to the trial court for resentencing consistent with the oral pronouncement at the sentencing hearing.
Finally, we find that appellant’s failure to timely object to the imposition of costs for testing procedures precludes our granting relief on that point. Smith v. State, 746 So. 2d 497 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999); Maddox v. State, 708 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).
SENTENCE VACATED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART; REMANDED.
ANTOON, C.J., HARRIS and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Maddox v. State, 708 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)
- Smith v. State, 746 So. 2d 497 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)