EMILIO M. ROJAS, APPELLANT,

v.

G. GONZALEZ WHOLESALE, INC., AND FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Hagan v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 804 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 2001)
  …f public policy, the allowance of such lawsuits without the threshold proofs discussed above could lead to an explosion of frivolous litigation, opening as some courts say a “Pandora’s box” of AIDS phobia claims. Cocar-Cola Bottling Co. v. Hagan, 750 So. 2d 83, 90-91 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) (footnotes omitted). By accepting this case and answering the rephrased question, the majority is issuing an advisory opinion. This Court may render advisory opinions only to the Governor and the Attorney General. See art.…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Gracey v. Eaker, 747 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)
  …Florida courts do not recognize the negligent infliction of emotional distress as a free standing tort. See R.J. v. Humana of Florida, Inc., 652 So. 2d 360, 365 (Fla.1995) (Kogan, J., concurring specially); see also Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Hagan, 750 So. 2d 83 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). Instead, Florida courts have historically adhered to a requirement that some physical impact to a claimant must be alleged and demonstrated before the claimant can recover damages. This requirement has been referred to as the “i…
• Willis v. Gami Golden Glades, LLC., 967 So. 2d 846 (Fla. 2007)
  …001) (certifying the question of whether the impact rule applies where a criminal defense attorney negligently causes a client's further imprisonment), approved in part and quashed in part, 850 So. 2d 474 (Fla.2003); Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Hagan, 750 So. 2d 83, 92 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) (Dauksch, J., concurring specially, joined by Sharp, J.) (certifying the question of whether the impact rule should be abolished or amended), quashed, 804 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 2001); Gracey v. Eaker, 747 So. 2d 475, 478 (Fla. 5t…

Authorities Cited

• Mel Heifetz v. Dep't of Bus. Reg., 475 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)