MEDVEST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND MEDVEST CORPORATION, APPELLANTS,
v.
BARRY M. SEINFELD AND MARSHA SEINFELD, APPELLEES
MEDVEST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND MEDVEST CORPORATION, APPELLANTS,
BARRY M. SEINFELD AND MARSHA SEINFELD, APPELLEES
748 So. 2d 1061
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1999)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Teate v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 524 So. 2d 1060 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bd. OF Trs. OF THE Internal Improvement Tr. Fund OF THE State of Fla. v. Support Terminals Operating P'ship, L.P., 776 So. 2d 337 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)…n appeal, we affirmed in part and reversed in part, concluding that all of the proposed rule was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority. See Anderson Columbia Company, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund, 748 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Thereafter, the ALJ awarded appellees attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to section 120.595(2), Florida Statutes (1999). The Trustees now appeal the order of the ALJ assessing costs and fees against them in excess of $75,000. W…
-
Sonido, LLC v. Arcadia Enters., LLC, 3 So. 3d 1273 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)…rently accepted their argument that the state’s re-versionary interest in the disclaimer was improper under the Bulkhead Act. The appellees relied on the decision in Anderson Columbia Co. v. Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Frond, 748 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). That case involved a proposed rule which provided for a reversionary interest in disclaimers issued under the Bulkhead Act. In Anderson Columbia this court determined that the proposed rule did not comport with the Bulkhead Act,…
Authorities Cited
- Teate v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 524 So. 2d 1060 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)