MICHAEL ROPER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MICHAEL ROPER, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
747 So. 2d 1038
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation for possession of crack cocaine, possession of drug paraphernalia and resisting arrest without violence, but remand for the trial court to enter a written order specifying the conditions of probation which were violated. See Watts v. State, 688 So. 2d 1018, 1019 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (“Although the procedures followed in a revocation of probation proceeding may be less formal than a full-blown criminal trial, the requirement of a written order of revocation is a mandatory one.”); Larangera v. State, 686 So. 2d 697, 698 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
Remanded for entry of a written probation order. WARNER, C.J., STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Monroe v. State, 833 So. 2d 246 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)…y control as to that count. Next, appellant argues her sentence requires reversal because the trial court failed to enter a separate written order of revocation specifying the violation upon which the court’s sentence is based. See Roper v. State, 747 So. 2d 1038, 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). We disagree and hold the court’s amended sentence satisfies this requirement where it specifically revokes appellant’s probation and identifies the condition appellant violated. Accordingly, we reverse the revocation and…
Authorities Cited
- Watts v. State, 688 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
- Larangera v. State, 686 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)