ROSE BRAVO, APPELLANT,
v.
MATILDA SAUTER, AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE VINCENT J. BRAVO REVOCABLE TRUST AGREEMENT (AS AMENDED), AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF VINCENT J. BRAVO, DECEASED, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1997-09-03
No. 97-1576
GLICKSTEIN, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
745 So. 2d 959 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1997) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We grant the motion and withdraw the opinion previously issued.

The motion to dismiss is treated as premature and denied without prejudice to renew after the filing of the record and briefs.

GLICKSTEIN, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Dorsett v. Granvill Dorsett, 902 So. 2d 947 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
    …ility to the child cannot be abdicated to any parent, any expert. That heavy responsibility mandates that a court is not bound by any agreement between parents.” Lane v. Lane, 599 So. 2d 218, 219 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); see, e.g., Sotoloff v. Sotoloff, 745 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (holding that a custodial parent may not contract away a child’s right to support). With regard to exclusive possession of the marital home, this court has held: [although the failure to award exclusive possession of the marita…
    1 / 2
  • Trista Anne Bower v. Hansman, 161 So. 3d 512 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)
    …iscussion. In determining Bower’s net income for the purpose of calculating child support, the trial court included as income child support Bower received on behalf of a child born from a prior relationship. This was error. See Sotoloff v. Sotoloff, 745 So. 2d 959, 961-62 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (child support payments mother received for her child from previous marriage could not be included in calculating child support obligation of father of child from subsequent marriage). On remand, after redetermining Bow…
  • Hauser v. Hauser, 778 So. 2d 309 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)
    …rt may, once again, order the husband to pay temporary child support from his assets, but only if the court finds that his recurrent income including interest and dividends is insufficient to meet the needs of the children. See Sotoloff v. Sotoloff, 745 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Dyer v. Dyer, 658 So. 2d 148 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). Reversed. BOOTH, ALLEN and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw