LADELL PLEASURE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
LADELL PLEASURE, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
744 So. 2d 1141
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Maharaj v. State, 684 So. 2d 726 (Fla.1996); Johnson v. State, 593 So. 2d 206 (Fla.1992); Medina v. State, 573 So. 2d 293 (Fla.1990); Jones v. State, 652 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Morse v. Morse, 796 So. 2d 1200 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)…the former husband’s knowledge and consent.5 Since there is substantial competent evidence, we, therefore, have no basis or jurisdiction to make a contrary finding. See Young v. Hector, 740 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); see also R.T.F. v. R.P.F., 744 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). As for the former husband’s remaining challenges to the custodial and/or visitation arrangements and equitable distribution, we find no abuse of discretion, as the court’s findings are all supported by competent substantial evid…
Authorities Cited
- Medina v. State, 573 So. 2d 293 (Fla. 1990)
- Krishna Maharaj v. State, 684 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 1996)
- Johnson v. State, 593 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 1992)
- Brown v. State, 652 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
- Jones v. State, 652 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)