BRUCE R. LUTZ AND SUSAN P. LUTZ, APPELLANTS,
v.
KEY TOWERS SOUTH OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., A FLORIDA NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION, APPELLEE
BRUCE R. LUTZ AND SUSAN P. LUTZ, APPELLANTS,
KEY TOWERS SOUTH OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., A FLORIDA NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION, APPELLEE
744 So. 2d 1131
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Bruce and Susan Lutz appeal the amended final judgment entered in favor of Key Towers South Owners Association, Inc. Key Towers cross-appeals, asserting the trial court’s error in the failure to award interest in the amended final judgment. We affirm the amended final judgment in all respects as to Bruce Lutz without discussion. However, we reverse the final judgment as to Susan Lutz because the parties agree that she was not named as a defendant in the count upon which the final judgment was entered.
Accordingly, we remand for entry of an amended final judgment that removes Susan Lutz as a named defendant.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.
BLUE, A.C.J., and FULMER and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hamilton v. State, 752 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)…rt appear to refute the claim. Since Hamilton alleges that the attached jail records are factually inaccurate, this affirmance is without prejudice to Hamilton raising this claim in a motion filed pursuant to rule 3.850. See, e.g., Benitez v. State, 744 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (affirming denial of a facially insufficient motion for additional jail credit without prejudice to raising the issue again either in a motion pursuant to rule 3.800 which meets the pleading requirements of Mancino or in a motion…
-
Sheely v. State, 891 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)…we affirm without prejudice to the appellant’s right to seek relief regarding any additional jail credit due to him in a timely filed motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See, e.g., Benitez v. State, 744 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). AFFIRMED. ERVIN and BENTON, JJ., concur; KAHN, J., concurs in result only.…